Second Time Reported, Prince Charles is Gay?
Second Time Reported, Prince Charles is Gay?
A
A
A
LONDON - This news is not yet confirmed, but this tabloid brave enough to write it. For the second time, American tabloid Globe Magazine reported if Prince Charles’ have a secret gay life. That blown wide open by shocking photos of the love-sick royal in a sizzling lip-lock with his toy boy beau!
That photos released in front page. Prince Charles, with his back turned to the camera kissing a young man titled ‘Charles caught kissing Boy Toy’! The piece claims, Buckingham Palace is in shock and now has to deal with another ‘gay’ scandal after Prince Harry.
According to the tabloid, the photo is evidence of Prince Charles’ s double life, while the front page also has sensational hits that read ‘Prince Disowned by humiliated Will & Kate’ and ‘Furious wife Camilla Demands divorce!’
The article reports that the leaked photo all but excludes any possibility of him succeeding his mother on the throne. It continues by claiming that Charles’s special sexual preferences are not a secret to the Palace, which is why Queen Elizabeth is unwilling to hand over the throne to her son, considering handing the crown directly to Prince William instead.
Now palace insiders say the explosive pictures, snapped by a mole in the monarchy, dash any chance Charles had to sit on Britain’s throne!
His mother, Queen Elizabeth, is stunned by the images and now more determined than ever to make her favorite grandchild, Prince William, her heir, sources say.
"Many people who call if that photo probably photoshopped but then again, I wouldn't put it past him," said Exposing Australian Rock Spiders in they Facebook account.
"He has, in the past, made other unrelated allegations, which the police have fully investigated and found to be unsubstantiated," the statement said. Smith, 43, worked for Prince Charles for 11 years until 1997.
In any case, the incident "simply could not have happened," said another ex-servant, Simon Solari.
Solari told the Evening Standard newspaper that Smith would never have been in a position to witness the incident he says he saw. In defending Charles, Solari also put more details into the public domain, but with little explanation.
"It would not have been in George's remit to attend the prince or serve him tea in his bedroom, that was a job for the senior valet," Solari was quoted as saying.
- See more at: http://www.elenasdiary.com/en/royal/4651-h-alitheia-gia-ton-karolo#sthash.wqYWe58x.dpuf
"He has, in the past, made other unrelated allegations, which the police have fully investigated and found to be unsubstantiated," the statement said. Smith, 43, worked for Prince Charles for 11 years until 1997.
"In any case, the incident "simply could not have happened," said another ex-servant, Simon Solari.
Solari told the Evening Standard newspaper that Smith would never have been in a position to witness the incident he says he saw. In defending Charles, Solari also put more details into the public domain, but with little explanation.
"It would not have been in George's remit to attend the prince or serve him tea in his bedroom, that was a job for the senior valet," Solari was quoted as saying.
"He has, in the past, made other unrelated allegations, which the police have fully investigated and found to be unsubstantiated," the statement said. Smith, 43, worked for Prince Charles for 11 years until 1997.
In any case, the incident "simply could not have happened," said another ex-servant, Simon Solari.
Solari told the Evening Standard newspaper that Smith would never have been in a position to witness the incident he says he saw. In defending Charles, Solari also put more details into the public domain, but with little explanation.
"It would not have been in George's remit to attend the prince or serve him tea in his bedroom, that was a job for the senior valet," Solari was quoted as saying.
- See more at: http://www.elenasdiary.com/en/royal/4651-h-alitheia-gia-ton-karolo#sthash.wqYWe58x.dpuf
The Palace has not yet issued any statement on the front page, but will most likely demand a retraction. In the past the same tabloid had published another front page that read ‘Prince Charles is Gay!’.
That photos released in front page. Prince Charles, with his back turned to the camera kissing a young man titled ‘Charles caught kissing Boy Toy’! The piece claims, Buckingham Palace is in shock and now has to deal with another ‘gay’ scandal after Prince Harry.
According to the tabloid, the photo is evidence of Prince Charles’ s double life, while the front page also has sensational hits that read ‘Prince Disowned by humiliated Will & Kate’ and ‘Furious wife Camilla Demands divorce!’
The article reports that the leaked photo all but excludes any possibility of him succeeding his mother on the throne. It continues by claiming that Charles’s special sexual preferences are not a secret to the Palace, which is why Queen Elizabeth is unwilling to hand over the throne to her son, considering handing the crown directly to Prince William instead.
Now palace insiders say the explosive pictures, snapped by a mole in the monarchy, dash any chance Charles had to sit on Britain’s throne!
His mother, Queen Elizabeth, is stunned by the images and now more determined than ever to make her favorite grandchild, Prince William, her heir, sources say.
"Many people who call if that photo probably photoshopped but then again, I wouldn't put it past him," said Exposing Australian Rock Spiders in they Facebook account.
"He has, in the past, made other unrelated allegations, which the police have fully investigated and found to be unsubstantiated," the statement said. Smith, 43, worked for Prince Charles for 11 years until 1997.
In any case, the incident "simply could not have happened," said another ex-servant, Simon Solari.
Solari told the Evening Standard newspaper that Smith would never have been in a position to witness the incident he says he saw. In defending Charles, Solari also put more details into the public domain, but with little explanation.
"It would not have been in George's remit to attend the prince or serve him tea in his bedroom, that was a job for the senior valet," Solari was quoted as saying.
- See more at: http://www.elenasdiary.com/en/royal/4651-h-alitheia-gia-ton-karolo#sthash.wqYWe58x.dpuf
"He has, in the past, made other unrelated allegations, which the police have fully investigated and found to be unsubstantiated," the statement said. Smith, 43, worked for Prince Charles for 11 years until 1997.
"In any case, the incident "simply could not have happened," said another ex-servant, Simon Solari.
Solari told the Evening Standard newspaper that Smith would never have been in a position to witness the incident he says he saw. In defending Charles, Solari also put more details into the public domain, but with little explanation.
"It would not have been in George's remit to attend the prince or serve him tea in his bedroom, that was a job for the senior valet," Solari was quoted as saying.
"He has, in the past, made other unrelated allegations, which the police have fully investigated and found to be unsubstantiated," the statement said. Smith, 43, worked for Prince Charles for 11 years until 1997.
In any case, the incident "simply could not have happened," said another ex-servant, Simon Solari.
Solari told the Evening Standard newspaper that Smith would never have been in a position to witness the incident he says he saw. In defending Charles, Solari also put more details into the public domain, but with little explanation.
"It would not have been in George's remit to attend the prince or serve him tea in his bedroom, that was a job for the senior valet," Solari was quoted as saying.
- See more at: http://www.elenasdiary.com/en/royal/4651-h-alitheia-gia-ton-karolo#sthash.wqYWe58x.dpuf
The Palace has not yet issued any statement on the front page, but will most likely demand a retraction. In the past the same tabloid had published another front page that read ‘Prince Charles is Gay!’.
(rnz)
Explore More