Verdict Today, Saipul Revealed DS Evidence
Selasa, 14 Juni 2016 - 07:27 WIB
Verdict Today, Saipul Revealed DS Evidence
A
A
A
JAKARTA - Today, dangdut singer Saipul Jamil will accept the verdict of cases of sexual harassment which reported by DS in mid-February. Earlier, prosecutors had demanded Saipul with a sentence of seven years in prison. Saipul himself had been read 111 pages defense plea.
Ahead of the verdict which read today, Saipul lawyers, Kasman Sangaji see what was alleged prosecution (JPU) is very contradictory and can not be justified before a judge.
"At the trial, only one to two percent in the lawsuit citing witnesses at the trial. They claim to a semicolon, numbers all based resumes results of the investigation (BAP)," said Kasman, recently.
He added, according to the KUHAP, what are the events in the trial, all of the statements of witnesses, experts, defendants, reference or letter that arise must be described clearly and completely to prosecute someone commit criminal acts clearly and conspicuously.
"Not only by the police investigation. That's what we have described clearly. We hope judges pay attention to this," said lawyer which graduate from UGM Yogyakarta.
He also has evidence which has not revealed in public. Proof of its, DS was not traumatized by the alleged acts of harassment by Saipul as is often conveyed to the public.
"We have evidence from DS social media which we monitor since February 18 and records DS acknowledgment of the truth of what is in that social media. In social media he active cooed deceit women. So where was the trauma," explained Kasman.
It also remains to relay reports of age forgery allegedly committed by DS .
"Although the verdict later still use article 82 of Law on Child Protection, but if proven DS falsified his age, the implementation of the verdict will fall," he concluded.
Ahead of the verdict which read today, Saipul lawyers, Kasman Sangaji see what was alleged prosecution (JPU) is very contradictory and can not be justified before a judge.
"At the trial, only one to two percent in the lawsuit citing witnesses at the trial. They claim to a semicolon, numbers all based resumes results of the investigation (BAP)," said Kasman, recently.
He added, according to the KUHAP, what are the events in the trial, all of the statements of witnesses, experts, defendants, reference or letter that arise must be described clearly and completely to prosecute someone commit criminal acts clearly and conspicuously.
"Not only by the police investigation. That's what we have described clearly. We hope judges pay attention to this," said lawyer which graduate from UGM Yogyakarta.
He also has evidence which has not revealed in public. Proof of its, DS was not traumatized by the alleged acts of harassment by Saipul as is often conveyed to the public.
"We have evidence from DS social media which we monitor since February 18 and records DS acknowledgment of the truth of what is in that social media. In social media he active cooed deceit women. So where was the trauma," explained Kasman.
It also remains to relay reports of age forgery allegedly committed by DS .
"Although the verdict later still use article 82 of Law on Child Protection, but if proven DS falsified his age, the implementation of the verdict will fall," he concluded.
(rnz)
